Connect with us

Opinion

Even Tinubu is not sure if Wale Edun resigned or was sacked

Published

on

Tinubu

Tinubu faces criticism amid confusion over Wale Edun’s exit as questions grow over whether the former finance minister resigned or was sacked

WALE Edun ceased being anonymous decades ago when he made his name elsewhere.

Advertisement
He is so close to Tinubu, politically, that if the now President drawled Wale, nobody would be guessing who he meant.

Yet we have been left guessing how the former Minister of Finance and Coordinating Minister of the Economy left office.

It is another proof that the only important thing to Tinubu is his re-election which is getting tougher.

“It has been a pleasure and privilege to serve your administration and the Renewed Hope Agenda,” a press statement by Bayo Onanuga, President Tinubu’s Media Adviser claimed Edun wrote in his letter of resignation.

Advertisement

“Under your leadership, Nigeria has emerged stronger, more resilient, and more internationally respected.

“I wish you and the administration every success in the future”.

Onanuga’s press release of 22 April was meant to refute the absurdity of Tinubu not knowing how to present the departure of Edun, who had resigned as Commissioner of Finance from Tinubu’s cabinet in 2004 when Tinubu was in his second term as Governor of Lagos State.

Advertisement

Edun’s ill-health had also been cited then as the reason for his resignation.

In the light of the flagging performance of Tinubu, if Edun a close associate, an astute economist and investment banker resigned, it could be seen as a verdict on the government.

The story would be worse if Edun were sacked after Tinubu had leveraged his expertise in praising the administration’s economic reforms.

Advertisement

Was Tinubu caught unawares by Edun’s resignation? Could anyone be allowed to walk out of Tinubu, who appears more stranded by the day?

Onanuga, in his statement, doubled down on Edun’s illustrious private sector career, “Before then, he worked from 1980 to 1986 at Chase Merchant Bank (later Continental) in Lagos. He joined the World Bank in September 1986 through the elite Young Professionals Programme, where he worked on economic and financial packages for several countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.
“In 1989, he co-founded Investment Banking & Trust Company Limited (now Stanbic IBTC) and served as executive director.

In 1994, he founded Denham Management Limited, which has since become the Chapelhill Denham Group. He served as chairman from 2008 to 2021.

Advertisement

Onanuga was 24 hours behind schedule with his curated rebuttal of how other Tinubu worshippers saw Edun. They wanted him out and got Tinubu’s buy-in.

Their dilemma was having no explanation for how suddenly the high-performing economy had conflicting figures of where things stood. They blamed Edun for that.

Edun had been public with poor performance of the budget, low funding of capital projects, rising debts, more borrowing.

Advertisement

These contradicted Tinubu’s claims about how removal of petroleum subsidy had saved the economy, led to a new prosperity.

In trying to defend Tinubu, he took the blame for low releases for capital projects. We are to believe that there were tonnes of money for the projects and Edun refused to release them.

An admission from the Office of Secretary to Government of the Federation – Edun was removed “to strengthen cohesion and synergy in governance.

Advertisement

In other words, he was sacked.

Edun had just stepped off the plane from representing Nigeria at the World Bank meetings in Washington. The urgency of removing was obvious.

Nigerians are not buying the stories that “ill-health” saw Edun out of the cabinet. Onanuga said Edun wanted to be excused so that he could focus on “his private business”.

Advertisement

Almost sounds like an allegation of Edun prioritising personal business over the public’s.

Tinubu cannot sack anyone over such a tribial matter.
Edun, whether he resigned or was sacked, raises more questions about accountability, insecurity, and the “primary purpose of Tinubu’s administration”.

Finally…
KENYAN President William Ruto, possibly irked by President Tinubu’s comment in Yenagoa that Kenyans were suffering more than Nigerians, mauled Nigeria with responses that supervened the matter.

Advertisement

“Our education is good. If you listen to a Nigerian speak English, you’ll need a translator. We’ve the best human capital anywhere in the world,” Ruto said in a video that has gone viral.

Some communication experts suggest that the response was directly targetted at Tinubu, and not other Nigerians.

FRIDAY morning started for me with the depressing story of Lisa Stephen who bandits left for dead after amputating her.

Advertisement

Her story on Channel 4 is still on Arise TV YouTube platform.

She lives in Widows Village, near Jos, a place that earned its name from its population of widows who bandits have brutally killed their husbands.

On the night she lost an arm, she lost more.

Advertisement

The bandits grabbed a 10-month-old baby she was breastfeeding and slashed it into two, forced her to watch her husband shot beside her and her second child killed by breaking the skull.

The villagers dread the next attack which they say will come, and there would be no security agents to defend them.

Didn’t the President deploy 5,000 drones “immediately” against bandits, when he visited Jos Airport? Tinubu is hardly working.

Advertisement

THE appointment of Fatima Zuntu as Director-General of the National Biosafety Management Agency, NBMA, has hit an iceberg.

The NBMA Act requires 15 years post-qualification experience.

Mrs. Zuntu left school 10 years ago.

Advertisement

The horde of people around President Tinubu can’t even screen a proposed appointee. We can only imagine what else they are not doing.

SOME communities in Kwara State have fallen under the control of bandits.

What is the benefit of being in the President’s party?

Advertisement

Governors of 31 States are firmly for the President but none of them is spared the attacks of bandits and terrorists.

What does the President do for those States?

Also read: Tinubu Returns to Abuja After Eid, UK Visit

What does the President do for Nigeria?

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Nigeria’s Data Privacy Moment The Court Has Spoken. Boardrooms Must Listen.

Published

on

Data

By Moses Braimah

 

Advertisement

Statement of fact, Nigeria’s data economy will never be the same again.

 

The most consequential technology ruling in Nigeria this year did not emerge from a fintech boardroom, a venture capital summit, or Silicon Valley. It came from a Federal High Court.

Advertisement

Also read: Goodness Nwachukwu Breaks F42 World Record to Win Discus Gold at Glasgow 2026 Commonwealth Games

In Emmanuel Harunna v. Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC), the court affirmed the Commission’s authority under the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA) 2023 to regulate major data handlers, including decentralized Point-of-Sale (PoS) agent networks. Far beyond a legal victory, the judgment redraws Nigeria’s digital economy.

It is a corporate wake-up call, a regulatory milestone, an economic opportunity and, above all, a victory for millions of Nigerians whose personal information has too often been treated as an unprotected commodity.

For the boardroom, here is a warning. Listen corporate directors, the era of treating data protection as an IT department responsibility has officially ended.

Advertisement

The court has effectively armed the NDPC with the legal certainty to enforce compliance across Nigeria’s digital ecosystem.

Under the NDPA, non-compliant organizations face administrative penalties that can reach the greater of ₦10 million or 2% of annual gross revenue, depending on the severity of the violation.

That transforms data governance from a routine compliance checklist into a board-level financial, legal and reputational risk requiring immediate executive oversight.

Advertisement

Global investors increasingly evaluate cybersecurity, privacy governance and regulatory maturity before deploying capital.

Companies with weak data controls now risk more than fines; they risk losing investor confidence, strategic partnerships and customer trust.

In today’s digital economy, data governance has become corporate governance.

Advertisement

This has also initiate the emergence of a new growth industry. Without any iota of doubt this ruling has unlock one of Nigeria’s most overlooked economic opportunities.

Every organization classified as a Data Controller or Processor of Major Importance must now register, conduct periodic compliance audits and strengthen internal governance.

That requirement creates sustained demand for licensed Data Protection Compliance Organisations (DPCOs), cybersecurity professionals, privacy lawyers, compliance auditors and certified Data Protection Officers (DPOs).

Advertisement

Thousands of qualified Nigerian graduates can now build careers in a rapidly expanding profession instead of competing for shrinking traditional employment opportunities.

For government, the implications are equally significant. Registration fees, annual compliance filings and lawful enforcement create sustainable internally generated revenue while expanding the formal digital economy.

More importantly, regulatory certainty reduces business uncertainty, making Nigeria increasingly attractive to global venture capital and technology investors seeking predictable governance. Trust is becoming one of the country’s most valuable digital assets.

Advertisement

A friend asked me, what’s in this for the ordinary Nigerians? Here is my take. One of the greatest beneficiaries of this ruling are ordinary Nigerians.

Every day, millions surrender personal information while opening bank accounts, using PoS terminals, shopping online, accessing healthcare, applying for loans or downloading mobile applications.

Too often, that data has travelled through weak governance systems, enabling identity theft, unauthorized disclosures, fraudulent transactions and predatory digital lending practices.

Advertisement

By affirming NDPC oversight across both formal institutions and informal agent networks, the court strengthens accountability throughout the entire data ecosystem.

It also gives regulators stronger legal footing to collaborate with other agencies in tackling rogue loan apps that harvest contact lists, misuse personal information and publicly shame borrowers.

Privacy is no longer merely a compliance issue; it is becoming a practical consumer protection tool and a cornerstone of digital trust.

Advertisement

Nigeria’s digital future will ultimately depend not only on innovation but on confidence. This landmark judgment establishes that confidence cannot exist without accountability.

For corporate boards, the message is unmistakable: compliance is now a strategic imperative.

For young professionals, a vibrant knowledge economy is emerging. For regulators, the ruling provides the legal certainty needed to enforce higher standards.

Advertisement

Also read: Goodness Nwachukwu Breaks F42 World Record to Win Discus Gold at Glasgow 2026 Commonwealth Games

And for global investors, it signals that Africa’s largest digital economy is evolving from regulatory ambiguity toward international best practice. The court has spoken. Smart organizations will not merely comply, they will compete by building trust.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending